http://consumerist.com/2014/07/31/zo...to-pet-a-lion/
Woman claims she was let into the back by a zoo employee and told she could pet a lion, which (for reasons only known to the lion) bit off part of her finger. Zoo claims the woman was trespassing and specifically told NOT to try and pet the lion.
Why is it I believe the zoo and not the woman?
Woman claims she was let into the back by a zoo employee and told she could pet a lion, which (for reasons only known to the lion) bit off part of her finger. Zoo claims the woman was trespassing and specifically told NOT to try and pet the lion.
Why is it I believe the zoo and not the woman?
Comment