In an art show sponsored by the Virginian-Pilot, the original first place winner, and the subsequently-chosen first-place winner were both denied prizes due to nudity (not prohibited in the rules) depicted in their artwork.
An editorial about the brouhaha by a Virginian-Pilot reporter.
An article regarding other entities raising funds to award the original and subsequent winners. Strangely, they decided that the second piece of art that they originally rejected was now ok to print an image of.
Here's a link to the image in question. Note: it's a generally non-revealing nude self-portrait of a 17-year-old girl. May be NSFW.
^-.-^
An editorial about the brouhaha by a Virginian-Pilot reporter.
An article regarding other entities raising funds to award the original and subsequent winners. Strangely, they decided that the second piece of art that they originally rejected was now ok to print an image of.
Here's a link to the image in question. Note: it's a generally non-revealing nude self-portrait of a 17-year-old girl. May be NSFW.
^-.-^
Comment