If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Testing
"I saw a flock of moosen! There were many of 'em. Many much moosen. Out in the woods- in the woodes- in the woodsen. The meese want the food. The food is to eatenesen."
Dunno draggar. Watching the whole video, it looks like a confrontation was brewing between the officer and someone else when the cameraman moved forward to start taping it. Shortly after that, he was ordered to put the camera away.
If the cameraman was on public property, not trespassing, and not interfering, then the cop was in the wrong.
You are correct that there is a period of time that is, basically, unaccounted for, though. I'd like to see it, but something makes me believe that, this time, the copy might well have been in the wrong.
What bothers me is that you do not see what hapens leading up to the incident.
While what we see looks like a reporter was being treated unfairly, what happened before that?
From what his boss was saying, the cop was in the wrong. I know I'm quick to usually jump on the cop's side if the situation is unclear, but in this case, I'd say he was a dick....
"Man, having a conversation with you is like walking through a salvador dali painting." - Mac Hall
Comment