http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8481827.stm
Basically, they had to pay because they fired a worker over a slice of cheese.
A co-worker purchased a hamburger, paid for it, then asked for a slice of cheese - which the worker added, but didn't charge for.
The court ruled in the favor of the fired worker.
Basically, they had to pay because they fired a worker over a slice of cheese.
A co-worker purchased a hamburger, paid for it, then asked for a slice of cheese - which the worker added, but didn't charge for.
The court ruled in the favor of the fired worker.
Comment