(I'm going to preface this by saying that this discussion really got me thinking, I had no idea this was going to be so long when I started writing it, and I have done my level best to stay out of fratching territory and I hope and think I've succeeded, but if the mods judge otherwise I submit wholly and humbly to your judgement. And now, without further ado, here is what turned into, "My essay on Forgiveness." )
Ah, forgiveness and absolution: two very different things that have become very much confused.
Forgiving someone is not something you do for the other person, it's something you do for yourself. The actual definitionof forgiveness is "the release of resentment." It is NOT exoneration or absolution. The forgiven still holds an obligation of retribution. The wrong done still exists; it is not suddenly something that is right or okay to do/have done. Forgiveness is something that ONLY the wronged can give and it's really something you are giving to yourself. You cannot forgive someone while you still feel resentment towards that person.
The continued harboring of resentment to those who have wronged you holds onto the pain that person caused, allowing the part of you (whether you call that part your soul, your internal self, your private self, your psyche, etc) injured by the wrong to remain injured, and, like a wound, it can fester or it can scar.
Sometimes it is impossible to move on, the internal wound remains open, causing your existence to be a function of the injury. Sometimes we pick at it, taking over for the person who wronged us and re-injuring ourselves. The wrong done to us becomes who we are. In these cases, for ourselves, we must learn to forgive in order to be free, to truly live.
But to forgive is not to forget. The wrong is part of our past, part of us, a scar: evidence of survival, proof that we are strong enough to endure, a reminder that we don't have to let the things done to us define us.
Since forgiveness is really a gift we give ourselves, to ask whether the other person "deserves" forgiveness is really the wrong question. What we should be asking, is do WE deserve forgiveness?
So what's really happening when the following exchange happens?
wrong-doer: "I apologize." (Please forgive me.)
wronged: "I forgive you?"
People ask for forgiveness for two reasons:
When you forgive someone, you aren't absolving them of guilt and you aren't saying that what they did was okay--the repentant knows this and continues to feel guilt and remorse over the wrong they've done. The unrepentant interprets forgiveness as absolution because they are seeking validation for their own point of view--the unrepentant receives forgiveness as an apology from the wronged for feeling wronged.
To say to someone "I forgive you" you are saying to that person, "I no longer resent the thing(s) that you did to me." Sometimes you are also saying "While you have wronged me, I still want a relationship with you and I am going accept in retribution the things you do to repair the relationship."
So, if forgiveness is the release of resentment and is something the wronged really does for themselves, what's all this business about God (big "G" or little "g", the FSM, or what-have-you) forgiving people? It goes back to my initial statement (copied and pasted here for your convenience). "Forgiveness and absolution: two very different things that have become very much confused." Yes, you can open pretty much any English translation (I honestly don't know about the other language editions, including the original languages the thing was written in because I, sadly and to my everlasting shame, speak and read only English...but I digress) and find the words "forgive" and "forgiveness" and "forgiven". Without digging out a copy of it or getting into a deep theological discussion (rather than one I've tried to keep philosophical) I'm going to leave it that most likely in some of those places the word is used correctly (for whatever superficial or "deep theological" reason) and in others absolution or another word is more correct.
Besides, the idea that God (or a god or a big ball of pasta flying through space) would or could hold resentment I find extremely scary and not altogether fitting with my understanding of things. However, the idea that I can be loved and cherished and belonging in good places with good people and good things despite the fact that I fuck up all the time, I find rather comforting. And that's what I think most people are trying to get at.
Others are just sanctimonious pricks.
Ah, forgiveness and absolution: two very different things that have become very much confused.
Forgiving someone is not something you do for the other person, it's something you do for yourself. The actual definitionof forgiveness is "the release of resentment." It is NOT exoneration or absolution. The forgiven still holds an obligation of retribution. The wrong done still exists; it is not suddenly something that is right or okay to do/have done. Forgiveness is something that ONLY the wronged can give and it's really something you are giving to yourself. You cannot forgive someone while you still feel resentment towards that person.
The continued harboring of resentment to those who have wronged you holds onto the pain that person caused, allowing the part of you (whether you call that part your soul, your internal self, your private self, your psyche, etc) injured by the wrong to remain injured, and, like a wound, it can fester or it can scar.
Sometimes it is impossible to move on, the internal wound remains open, causing your existence to be a function of the injury. Sometimes we pick at it, taking over for the person who wronged us and re-injuring ourselves. The wrong done to us becomes who we are. In these cases, for ourselves, we must learn to forgive in order to be free, to truly live.
But to forgive is not to forget. The wrong is part of our past, part of us, a scar: evidence of survival, proof that we are strong enough to endure, a reminder that we don't have to let the things done to us define us.
Since forgiveness is really a gift we give ourselves, to ask whether the other person "deserves" forgiveness is really the wrong question. What we should be asking, is do WE deserve forgiveness?
So what's really happening when the following exchange happens?
wrong-doer: "I apologize." (Please forgive me.)
wronged: "I forgive you?"
People ask for forgiveness for two reasons:
- The repentant knows they've done wrong, feels guilt and remorse, and wants to repair the breach in the relationship that they've caused.
- The unrepentant doesn't believe they've done anything wrong, they just don't like others thinking badly of them.
When you forgive someone, you aren't absolving them of guilt and you aren't saying that what they did was okay--the repentant knows this and continues to feel guilt and remorse over the wrong they've done. The unrepentant interprets forgiveness as absolution because they are seeking validation for their own point of view--the unrepentant receives forgiveness as an apology from the wronged for feeling wronged.
To say to someone "I forgive you" you are saying to that person, "I no longer resent the thing(s) that you did to me." Sometimes you are also saying "While you have wronged me, I still want a relationship with you and I am going accept in retribution the things you do to repair the relationship."
So, if forgiveness is the release of resentment and is something the wronged really does for themselves, what's all this business about God (big "G" or little "g", the FSM, or what-have-you) forgiving people? It goes back to my initial statement (copied and pasted here for your convenience). "Forgiveness and absolution: two very different things that have become very much confused." Yes, you can open pretty much any English translation (I honestly don't know about the other language editions, including the original languages the thing was written in because I, sadly and to my everlasting shame, speak and read only English...but I digress) and find the words "forgive" and "forgiveness" and "forgiven". Without digging out a copy of it or getting into a deep theological discussion (rather than one I've tried to keep philosophical) I'm going to leave it that most likely in some of those places the word is used correctly (for whatever superficial or "deep theological" reason) and in others absolution or another word is more correct.
Besides, the idea that God (or a god or a big ball of pasta flying through space) would or could hold resentment I find extremely scary and not altogether fitting with my understanding of things. However, the idea that I can be loved and cherished and belonging in good places with good people and good things despite the fact that I fuck up all the time, I find rather comforting. And that's what I think most people are trying to get at.
Others are just sanctimonious pricks.
Comment