Perhaps someone can shed some light on this for me, because I can't begin to fathom how this makes ANY sense.
We had inventory last night. I had to be there despite the fact that an outside crew was doing all the grunt work.
After they counted a section, they affixed a tag to the shelf with the total count for that section. This number wasn't broken down by SKU at all; it was just a total number of items in that section. ie "Q=558"
Partway into this, I come to find out that I am supposed to be going back through the sections they've finished and verify those counts. That is, just count up how many things are in that section, and see if my count agrees with theirs.
First of all, no one told me this. I'd been in the back room checking some count discrepancies in the backstocked furniture, and apparently the OpsMan held a little rally meeting while I was doing this, then didn't bother filling me in when I finished checking on the variances. And this was MY fault? What was I doing this whole time? Getting SKU checks for the inventory crew!
Idiot......
Now, this recount process - in addition to being a colossal pain in the ass - was absolutely pointless.
For one thing, when there are hundreds of items per section, there's really no way to know if my recount was off, or their initial count was off. And I'm sure as hell not counting the same section twice.
Second, since these recounts aren't broken down by SKU, they to little - if anything - to show where the error may be.
Third, we didn't even finish doing that job. At least half the store was not double counted when we called it quits. And now that they store has been reopened, there's no point in any further counts, since the second anything is bought, the counts WILL be off. If it was so important to do this, why didn't we stay to finish counting? And if it's not that critical, then why were we wasting our time.
Fourth, the inventory crew was NOT recounting sections where we found problems.
And last but not least, the system automatically highlights all noteworthy variances for a recount. So regardless of what each section count it, we're still gonna have to check the SKUs with discrepancies, and THAT is what will determine the final count for those items.
So......any one have any clue why we'd have to do that? I asked and was not given an answer beyond "it's important to get an accurate count" without any explanation as to how this helps.
We had inventory last night. I had to be there despite the fact that an outside crew was doing all the grunt work.
After they counted a section, they affixed a tag to the shelf with the total count for that section. This number wasn't broken down by SKU at all; it was just a total number of items in that section. ie "Q=558"
Partway into this, I come to find out that I am supposed to be going back through the sections they've finished and verify those counts. That is, just count up how many things are in that section, and see if my count agrees with theirs.
First of all, no one told me this. I'd been in the back room checking some count discrepancies in the backstocked furniture, and apparently the OpsMan held a little rally meeting while I was doing this, then didn't bother filling me in when I finished checking on the variances. And this was MY fault? What was I doing this whole time? Getting SKU checks for the inventory crew!
Idiot......
Now, this recount process - in addition to being a colossal pain in the ass - was absolutely pointless.
For one thing, when there are hundreds of items per section, there's really no way to know if my recount was off, or their initial count was off. And I'm sure as hell not counting the same section twice.
Second, since these recounts aren't broken down by SKU, they to little - if anything - to show where the error may be.
Third, we didn't even finish doing that job. At least half the store was not double counted when we called it quits. And now that they store has been reopened, there's no point in any further counts, since the second anything is bought, the counts WILL be off. If it was so important to do this, why didn't we stay to finish counting? And if it's not that critical, then why were we wasting our time.
Fourth, the inventory crew was NOT recounting sections where we found problems.
And last but not least, the system automatically highlights all noteworthy variances for a recount. So regardless of what each section count it, we're still gonna have to check the SKUs with discrepancies, and THAT is what will determine the final count for those items.
So......any one have any clue why we'd have to do that? I asked and was not given an answer beyond "it's important to get an accurate count" without any explanation as to how this helps.
Comment