In one issue of Cosmo I read (sneakily while I was waiting for my Nasi Goreng to be cooked at the noodle shop), they had a bunch of total loser wanker guys commenting on a range of girls and what dress size they thought they were
I thought that was the most sexist irresponsible article I've ever seen. I stopped buying Cosmo when I was 18 and realised that real life wasn't anything like they portrayed it. I mean, really, $500 for a pair of mind bogglingly high shoes that you "must have" or you're a loser? Shoes that will only go out of style in six months anyway
Give me good old New Scientist or Focus magazines any day (both science oriented). I think I'll take any tips they give me instead.

I thought that was the most sexist irresponsible article I've ever seen. I stopped buying Cosmo when I was 18 and realised that real life wasn't anything like they portrayed it. I mean, really, $500 for a pair of mind bogglingly high shoes that you "must have" or you're a loser? Shoes that will only go out of style in six months anyway

Give me good old New Scientist or Focus magazines any day (both science oriented). I think I'll take any tips they give me instead.
Comment