My own idea of a response to him:
Sir you might have passed the board, but I passed math. Anyone with a highschool edcuation knows that 50% plus 30% is NOT 80%.
If anything he's just trying to play the "lawyer card" just to scam you.
Sure it'd be nice if you could add percentage like that but it doesn't work that way. Say it's $100. take away 50% and then 30% and you end up paying $35. He was just trying to scam you out of money.
So... my other idea of a response is: Go ahead and sue then. Make an official paper-trail showing that you're trying to scam us out of money.
(he'll back down, or sputter and try to bluff more...but he won't ever sue you... no real lawyer would want the judge knowing that he was using his position in law to scam a store)
Sir you might have passed the board, but I passed math. Anyone with a highschool edcuation knows that 50% plus 30% is NOT 80%.
If anything he's just trying to play the "lawyer card" just to scam you.
Sure it'd be nice if you could add percentage like that but it doesn't work that way. Say it's $100. take away 50% and then 30% and you end up paying $35. He was just trying to scam you out of money.
So... my other idea of a response is: Go ahead and sue then. Make an official paper-trail showing that you're trying to scam us out of money.
(he'll back down, or sputter and try to bluff more...but he won't ever sue you... no real lawyer would want the judge knowing that he was using his position in law to scam a store)
Comment