A child of that age is not capable of being a sucky customer. They simply don't have the ability to understand the social nuances. At that stage, sucky or not-sucky is the responsibility of the parent.
Similarly, children older than that should know the difference between buying things and theft, but probably don't understand lay-by or other more complicated transactions. Again, the parent/guardian is responsible.
And the intellectually disabled may also be incapable of being sucky customers themselves - but their carer (or whoever lets them out without a carer) can be.
As for whether or not you were sucky: I say no. In a perfect world, you would have noticed the candy before you left the store -- but here in reality, you handled it just fine.
IMO, that's the only possible lapse: and golly gee whiz, does that mean you're human?
Summary: kid too young to be sucky. Parent handled it like a responsible, sensible human. Ergo, no suck.
Similarly, children older than that should know the difference between buying things and theft, but probably don't understand lay-by or other more complicated transactions. Again, the parent/guardian is responsible.
And the intellectually disabled may also be incapable of being sucky customers themselves - but their carer (or whoever lets them out without a carer) can be.
As for whether or not you were sucky: I say no. In a perfect world, you would have noticed the candy before you left the store -- but here in reality, you handled it just fine.
IMO, that's the only possible lapse: and golly gee whiz, does that mean you're human?
Summary: kid too young to be sucky. Parent handled it like a responsible, sensible human. Ergo, no suck.
Comment