Your "bank-robbing" straw-man argument aside, that's an easy knee-jerk reaction, and a common one, at that. In fact, a piece believed to be a Banksy was installed on a building in Park City's historic district during last year's Sundance Film Festival, which their mayor promptly had removed using the exact same logic you employed.
I disagree.
Street art is about commenting on one's environment using its existing language, rather than immaturely getting one's rocks off by committing an act of random vandalism.
To be clear, I find the graffiti in the OP to be repugnant, and in no way condone it; however I believe that street art should not be painted with the same brush as territorial graffiti, vandalism, and corporate "art."
I disagree.
Street art is about commenting on one's environment using its existing language, rather than immaturely getting one's rocks off by committing an act of random vandalism.
To be clear, I find the graffiti in the OP to be repugnant, and in no way condone it; however I believe that street art should not be painted with the same brush as territorial graffiti, vandalism, and corporate "art."
Comment