Or something like that.
Not terribly sucky, mostly irritating as heck, but I just had a 20 minute discussion with a client explaining why the super tiny thumbnail picture he wanted in his logo...has to remain super tiny. We are talking, an image 30% smaller than the avatars on this forum.
Originally he was asking me to give him a "huge logo" for his site. I was like, uh, no, not going to happen with that image that you specifically requested MUST be in your logo. He complained, saying "its big on my screen". Well, no, not really, and on top of that, screen size =/= printed size. I tried to explain picture DPI (standard document print is 72 dpi, pictures *should* be 300 dpi....the image he gave me was 57.....) and how his would look terrible any larger than it was now.
20 minutes later, after trying to get through about this, and thinking it finally sank in...he goes "well, send me a transparent one so I can at least get it made into a nice bumper sticker."
Not terribly sucky, mostly irritating as heck, but I just had a 20 minute discussion with a client explaining why the super tiny thumbnail picture he wanted in his logo...has to remain super tiny. We are talking, an image 30% smaller than the avatars on this forum.
Originally he was asking me to give him a "huge logo" for his site. I was like, uh, no, not going to happen with that image that you specifically requested MUST be in your logo. He complained, saying "its big on my screen". Well, no, not really, and on top of that, screen size =/= printed size. I tried to explain picture DPI (standard document print is 72 dpi, pictures *should* be 300 dpi....the image he gave me was 57.....) and how his would look terrible any larger than it was now.
20 minutes later, after trying to get through about this, and thinking it finally sank in...he goes "well, send me a transparent one so I can at least get it made into a nice bumper sticker."

Comment