Here's something that's bugged me.
The last two jobs I have worked have been sales oriented. Frequently I've noticed sales contests are run in which MANAGERS or SUPERVISORS are the sole beneficiaries, either of cash bonuses, prizes or extra time off.
Let's say the contest involves selling the highest number of extended warranties in a given week. So my manager Joe decides he wants to try hard to win this contest. So he tells me to work my butt off to sell more extended warranties that we get no commission on whatsoever because he wants to win the contest.
Herein lies the problem: There is ABSOLUTELY NO BENEFIT to work harder to sell extended warranties.
I think it's great that Manager Joe wants to win this contest and get extra time off, but where's the motivation for me? It seems corporate wants me to think the main motivation is that if I don't sell enough I don't keep my job, but that's kind of insulting to me, because then it's like:
Message to managers: Sell more warranties and earn extra days off!
Message to regular associates: Don't sell enough warranties and be fired!
I understand that corporate has to motivate the managers to do their job well, but why not offer some incentive for the regular employees too. For example a $500 bonus for the manager and $150 for his employees.
I really can't stand negative reinforcement as a management tactic. It should always be "work hard and these will be your rewards" not "if you don't work hard enough here's what's going to happen."
Obviously it should be clear to anyone who works anywhere that if you don't do your job well, there will be discplinary action up to and including termination. They shouldn't have to hold that over heads to make us work hard.
I have little faith that this will change anytime soon, after all, since when has corporate ever shown much intelligence?
The last two jobs I have worked have been sales oriented. Frequently I've noticed sales contests are run in which MANAGERS or SUPERVISORS are the sole beneficiaries, either of cash bonuses, prizes or extra time off.
Let's say the contest involves selling the highest number of extended warranties in a given week. So my manager Joe decides he wants to try hard to win this contest. So he tells me to work my butt off to sell more extended warranties that we get no commission on whatsoever because he wants to win the contest.
Herein lies the problem: There is ABSOLUTELY NO BENEFIT to work harder to sell extended warranties.
I think it's great that Manager Joe wants to win this contest and get extra time off, but where's the motivation for me? It seems corporate wants me to think the main motivation is that if I don't sell enough I don't keep my job, but that's kind of insulting to me, because then it's like:
Message to managers: Sell more warranties and earn extra days off!
Message to regular associates: Don't sell enough warranties and be fired!
I understand that corporate has to motivate the managers to do their job well, but why not offer some incentive for the regular employees too. For example a $500 bonus for the manager and $150 for his employees.
I really can't stand negative reinforcement as a management tactic. It should always be "work hard and these will be your rewards" not "if you don't work hard enough here's what's going to happen."
Obviously it should be clear to anyone who works anywhere that if you don't do your job well, there will be discplinary action up to and including termination. They shouldn't have to hold that over heads to make us work hard.
I have little faith that this will change anytime soon, after all, since when has corporate ever shown much intelligence?
Comment