SC comes in with a 3 year old phone that yes, did cost $300 when it came out.
It's shot, so I approve it for an exchange, I give my suggestion but the floor rep said not to give them that phone, but to go with another, and the manager agrees with the reps auggestion. OK, fine, it's missing a few things that the older phone has, but generally has all the same features.
The floor rep gets this customer when they come in to pick up her phone and sure enough, the rep calls me out to explain why were swapping out the phone. Well, it's shot and we can't fix it.
Customer then sees what model she's getting, and sees that it's a $150 phone. She puts out a huge stink since we're "ripping her off" by not giving her another $300 phone.
I explain to her that we swap bout based on the features, not the price, and she then asks "well, what are the features"? (You don't know what your own phone has?).
She puts up this argument for a while. I even told the lady that a $300 phone one year will be replaced by one with the same features for $200 the next year, and $100 the next year.
I guess she has no concept of depreciation of value?
It's shot, so I approve it for an exchange, I give my suggestion but the floor rep said not to give them that phone, but to go with another, and the manager agrees with the reps auggestion. OK, fine, it's missing a few things that the older phone has, but generally has all the same features.
The floor rep gets this customer when they come in to pick up her phone and sure enough, the rep calls me out to explain why were swapping out the phone. Well, it's shot and we can't fix it.
Customer then sees what model she's getting, and sees that it's a $150 phone. She puts out a huge stink since we're "ripping her off" by not giving her another $300 phone.
I explain to her that we swap bout based on the features, not the price, and she then asks "well, what are the features"? (You don't know what your own phone has?).
She puts up this argument for a while. I even told the lady that a $300 phone one year will be replaced by one with the same features for $200 the next year, and $100 the next year.
I guess she has no concept of depreciation of value?
Comment