If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
While a part of me questions the "ethicalness" of this practice
The customer wanted it fast, and wanted it done properly. That never comes cheap.
Seshat's self-help guide:
1. Would you rather be right, or get the result you want?
2. If you're consistently getting results you don't want, change what you do.
3. Deal with the situation you have now, however it occurred.
4. Accept the consequences of your decisions.
"All I want is a pretty girl, a decent meal, and the right to shoot lightning at fools." - Anders, Dragon Age.
While a part of me questions the "ethicalness" of this practice...the rest of me says
The price of the product is being set to match the support costs. At the computer store, a full audit showed some customers cost more to support for the same product than others.
Good customers return items within the warranty period if a problem occurs then. That way the dealer gets parts&labour back from the manufacturer (first year), or at-least parts (years two & three).
Bad customers bring a product outside the warrenty periods but demand free repairs, claiming it failed inside the warranty period.
Good customers need to be shown a solution to a problem once.
Bad customers need the same solution explain every other week.
Good customers pay for what they get on time.
Bad customers try to scam extras and are late with their payments.
Comment