Christmas is, these days, mostly celebrated as an opportunity to take a holiday and receive presents - and, of course, received presents have to be given by someone, so there's a social obligation to do so in return.
The religious aspects of it tend to take a back seat in most cases. In places with Christian connections, there's usually a reminder of the Nativity story. I'm sure the Jews pay attention to Hannukah, and whatever meaning it is that they attach to that.
Santa Claus - including his name - is descended from the concept of Saint Nicholas. This title indicates a religious origin, albeit probably separate from the Nativity. The gifts involved have got more numerous and sophisticated over the centuries.
But I'm agnostic, and I'm sure that most true atheists are capable of going with the holiday spirit while casually ignoring the religious aspects. Santa himself is generally reserved for the children, with adults explicitly giving presents to each other instead of going via the proxy figure.
The one thing I take issue with is the commercial over-exploitation of the symbols associated with Christmas. This doesn't seem to be as severe in Europe as in America, and there are fairly obvious reasons for that. But I see nothing at all wrong with treating "Christmas" as the name of the winter solstice holiday, since that's what most people treat it as in practice.
As I said before, some people - a vocal minority, as per usual - will just take any excuse to get offended. It's probably best to ignore them and cater to the quiet majority.
The religious aspects of it tend to take a back seat in most cases. In places with Christian connections, there's usually a reminder of the Nativity story. I'm sure the Jews pay attention to Hannukah, and whatever meaning it is that they attach to that.
Santa Claus - including his name - is descended from the concept of Saint Nicholas. This title indicates a religious origin, albeit probably separate from the Nativity. The gifts involved have got more numerous and sophisticated over the centuries.
But I'm agnostic, and I'm sure that most true atheists are capable of going with the holiday spirit while casually ignoring the religious aspects. Santa himself is generally reserved for the children, with adults explicitly giving presents to each other instead of going via the proxy figure.
The one thing I take issue with is the commercial over-exploitation of the symbols associated with Christmas. This doesn't seem to be as severe in Europe as in America, and there are fairly obvious reasons for that. But I see nothing at all wrong with treating "Christmas" as the name of the winter solstice holiday, since that's what most people treat it as in practice.
As I said before, some people - a vocal minority, as per usual - will just take any excuse to get offended. It's probably best to ignore them and cater to the quiet majority.
Comment