There must be a statement somewhere that says whether it's the parent's or the store's responsibility when a child gets hurt on the premises. If it's the parent's responsibility, the parent should be legally held responsible for any damage caused by a child; if it's the store's responsibility, the company should stand behind any employee who tells a kid to behave (when the so-called parental unit isn't doing its job).
I know it probably falls under the heading of things that make sense and are therefore simply not done... but this is heading out of the realm of 'common sense' (which we all know corporate and legal executives are lacking) and into the realm of 'economic sense' (because it prevents product loss and lawsuits).
I know it probably falls under the heading of things that make sense and are therefore simply not done... but this is heading out of the realm of 'common sense' (which we all know corporate and legal executives are lacking) and into the realm of 'economic sense' (because it prevents product loss and lawsuits).
Comment