Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Complaining about FREE Software

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Complaining about FREE Software

    We have a nifty little freeware product on our web site. It is designed for students who are learning certain skill but anyone is welcome to download and use it, even if they are not a student.

    Because it is freeware we have a statement with the download link informing people that we don't support it. (Although we do offer limted support to teachers so they can support their students in turn.)

    We do get some calls and emails from folks seeking support. For the most part they just didn't see the notice and act like civilized humans when I politely let them know that we don't support freeware.

    But some of them get pretty entitled. I you do thread search under my name with "freeware" as the search term, you'll find some examples.

    Todays EW was this:

    Caller: I'm using [freeware] with [other program] and [other program] isn't working right any more.

    Me: [Freeware] isn't designed to work with [other program.]

    Caller: But it worked before and it's not working now!

    Me: I understand. However, [freeware] only does one thing and it is not supposed to work with [other program].

    Caller: But it did before!

    Me: Nevertheless it's not designed to work with that program and we also don't have tech support for [freeware]. There's really nothing we can do to change that.

    Caller: But it did it before! And I use it for work!

    Me: Our [paid product] is designed to work well with [other program] and comes with tech support. If you have a license for [paid program] you can [perform the same function] and [other program] will work just fine with it.

    Caller: I dont have a copy of [paid program.] We are using [competitor's product].

    Me: I see. Well, [freeware] is designed with very limited functionality. It is simply not designed to work with [other program]. It should be possible to use it for [its intended function] without also using [other program].

    Caller: It's not very useful to me that way.

    The rest of the call was me making soothing noises at her until she gave up and went away.

    She gave me a headache. It's smegging FREE for crying out loud. If we spent all of our time making this product "useful" (as our SCs define useful) it would have all of the functions of our paid product and we'd either go out of business or end up charging the same price for it as our paid product.
    The best karma is letting a jerk bash himself senseless on the wall of your polite indifference.

    The stupid is strong with this one.

  • #2
    I love it when people either demand a refund or threaten to sue over free products.
    Quote Dalesys:
    ... as in "Ifn thet dawg comes at me, Ima gonna shutz ma panz!"

    Comment


    • #3
      EXCEPT WHEN
      OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES
      PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED
      OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
      MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS
      TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE
      PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING,
      REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
      I think that you should be able to use that, but have to cite it as part of the GPL....
      Otaku

      Comment


      • #4
        Er, no. GPL would be a bad idea. This freeware is, after all, based on the code of their flagship product, and if you GPL part of it, you need to GPL it all.
        Ba'al: I'm a god. Gods are all-knowing.

        http://unrelatedcaptions.com/45147

        Comment


        • #5
          Quoth Broomjockey View Post
          Er, no. GPL would be a bad idea. This freeware is, after all, based on the code of their flagship product, and if you GPL part of it, you need to GPL it all.
          I'm not suggesting to GPL it, I'm suggesting to borrow from the GPL for part of the terms, or re-write something similar.
          Otaku

          Comment


          • #6
            Quoth prb View Post
            I'm not suggesting to GPL it, I'm suggesting to borrow from the GPL for part of the terms
            Yes, and legally, I'm fairly certain you can't do that. If you're using part of it, then you'd have to use all of it, or the GPL people would be most upset. Besides, I'm fairly certain a company that's been around as long as Dips' already has a proviso like that, which they came up with on their own. They don't need the potential legal issues of "borrowing" licence terms from elsewhere.
            Ba'al: I'm a god. Gods are all-knowing.

            http://unrelatedcaptions.com/45147

            Comment


            • #7
              No worries about our license terms. We've got that covered pretty well. This software business was founded in 1975. The owner has plenty of experience writing license agreements. He also knows it's a good idea to hire an attorney to review agreements he has written. Just in case.
              The best karma is letting a jerk bash himself senseless on the wall of your polite indifference.

              The stupid is strong with this one.

              Comment

              Working...